EMPATHIA: Multi-Faceted Human-AI
Collaboration for Refugee Integration

Submitted to NeurIPS 2025 Creative AI Track: Humanity

1Texas A&M University | 2Istanbul Technical University | 3Hamad Bin Khalifa University
more soon...
Cultural
Emotional
Ethical

Abstract

Current AI approaches to refugee integration optimize narrow objectives such as employment and fail to capture the cultural, emotional, and ethical dimensions critical for long-term success. We introduce EMPATHIA (Enriched Multimodal Pathways for Agentic Thinking in Humanitarian Immigrant Assistance), a multi-agent framework addressing the central Creative AI question: how do we preserve human dignity when machines participate in life-altering decisions? Grounded in Kegan's Constructive Developmental Theory, EMPATHIA decomposes integration into three modules: SEED (Socio-cultural Entry and Embedding Decision) for initial placement, RISE (Rapid Integration and Self-sufficiency Engine) for early independence, and THRIVE (Transcultural Harmony and Resilience through Integrated Values and Engagement) for sustained outcomes. SEED employs a selector–validator architecture with three specialized agents—emotional, cultural, and ethical—that deliberate transparently to produce interpretable recommendations. Experiments on the UN Kakuma dataset (15,026 individuals, 7,960 eligible adults 15+ per ILO/UNHCR standards) and implementation on 6,359 working-age refugees (15+) with 150+ socioeconomic variables achieved 87.4% validation convergence and explainable assessments across five host countries. EMPATHIA's weighted integration of cultural emotional, and ethical factors balances competing value systems while supporting practitioner–AI collaboration. By augmenting rather than replacing human expertise, EMPATHIA provides a generalizable framework for AI-driven allocation tasks where multiple values must be reconciled.

System Architecture

EMPATHIA Framework

EMPATHIA's Human-AI Collaborative Framework demonstrates how artificial intelligence amplifies rather than replaces human wisdom through three developmental phases: SEED (initial placement honoring individual narratives), RISE (identity construction through meaningful participation), and THRIVE (transcultural harmony enriching both refugee and host communities).

Interactive Demo: SEED Module Assessment

Refugee Profile & Assessment

Profile Information

Select a refugee profile to view details

Data Disclaimer: This demo employs synthetic data designed to emulate characteristics of UN refugee datasets for methodological demonstration. While our paper utilizes authentic UNHCR data, privacy constraints necessitate the use of synthetic data for this public demonstration. Both authentic and synthetic datasets were processed through our SEED module. The presented framework and analytical outcomes are affected by data quality; performance metrics would be enhanced with richer feature representations. We cannot distribute genuine UNHCR data due to privacy restrictions. Researchers seeking access to authentic UN Kakuma refugee data should submit formal requests directly to UNHCR (see Dataset section). The demonstration illustrates SEED module reasoning and potential scalability.
Assessment Scores
Cultural

-

/10
Emotional

-

/10
Ethical

-

/10
Multi-Agent Assessment Reasoning
Select a refugee profile and run the assessment to see detailed reasoning from each agent

Multi-Agent Deliberation Quality

Profile Complexity
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
Low(<5)89293.71.12.9491.33.2
Med(5-10)264789.81.21.9187.24.1
High(11-15)128386.41.34.8883.64.8
V.High(>15)29581.21.67.8478.95.6
Validator Feedback
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
No Issues40871001.00.9491.84.2
Minor Ref78367.32.00.8682.44.3
Major Rev24748.23.21.7874.64.5
-------
Decision Difficulty
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
Unanimous184796.31.08.9694.73.8
Strong Con210389.21.19.9186.84.2
Mod Div98383.71.42.8681.24.6
High Div18472.41.89.7973.45.1
Reasoning Depth
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
Surface(1-2)41282.31.43.8380.72.0
Mod(3-4)312689.71.22.9187.23.5
Deep(5-6)139491.21.19.9388.95.5
V.Deep(7+)18593.61.24.9591.37.8
Perspective Balance
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
Aligned(±0.5)163894.81.11.9593.24.0
Minor(±1.0)231489.31.23.9086.74.3
Mod(±2.0)94784.61.38.8782.14.5
High(>±2.0)21876.21.71.8275.34.9
Explanation Quality
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
High Inter347192.81.16.9490.34.3
Interpretable129385.31.31.8884.64.1
Partial Inter35378.61.58.8177.93.8
-------
Reasoning Patterns
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
Evidence389291.41.18.9389.74.4
Theory84786.21.32.8884.33.9
Mixed37883.71.46.8581.64.1
-------
Bias Detection & Consistency
CatNConvIterCohAgrDep
No Bias495389.81.23.9187.14.2
Bias Corr16482.11.67.8580.34.4
Temp Stable478290.21.22.9287.84.2
Minor Fluct33581.31.48.8479.64.3

Best 2nd | N=6,359 • 87.4% conv

Table: Multi-Agent Deliberation Quality Across Reasoning Complexity Dimensions. Profile Complexity: decision factor count; Decision Difficulty: agent score variance (unanimous: ±0.2, consensus: ±0.5, divergence: >±1.0); Validator Feedback: resolution iterations; Reasoning Depth: inference levels (1–7+). Bold = highest, underline = second highest. All p<0.001, bootstrap n=1000.

Dataset

The evaluation was conducted on the UN Kakuma dataset from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), comprising detailed profiles of 15,026 individuals from 12 countries of origin, aged 0-95, with diverse educational, skill, and family backgrounds. For access to the dataset, please request it directly here from the UNHCR library.

Citation

@article{barhdadi2025empathia,
  title={EMPATHIA: Multi-Faceted Human-AI Collaboration for Refugee Integration},
  author={Barhdadi, Mohamed Rayan and Tuncel, Mehmet and Serpedin, Erchin and Kurban, Hasan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07671},
  year={2025},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07671}
}

Contact

Corresponding Author: Dr. Hasan Kurban (hkurban@hbku.edu.qa)

For Code & Data Inquiries: Mohamed Rayan Barhdadi (rayan.barhdadi@tamu.edu)